import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import statsmodels.api as smBayesian high-dimensional linear regression¶
Today we shall look at the idea of regularization in the context of regression with many covariates (also known as ‘high-dimensional’ regression). We work with a very simple dataset to illustrate the key ideas. This simple dataset, which comes from the introductory statistics textbook “Statistical Sleuth” by Ramsey and Schafer, contains weekly wages in 1987 for a sample of 25437 males between the ages of 18 and 70 who worked full-time along with their years of education, years of experience, indicator variable for whether they worked near a city, and a code for the region in the US where they worked.
#Load the dataset wagedata.csv
dt = pd.read_csv("wagedata.csv")
print(dt.head(10)) Region MetropolitanStatus Exper Educ WeeklyEarnings
0 South NotMetropolitanArea 8 12 859.71
1 Midwest MetropolitanArea 30 12 786.73
2 West MetropolitanArea 31 14 1424.50
3 West MetropolitanArea 17 16 959.16
4 West MetropolitanArea 6 12 154.32
5 Midwest MetropolitanArea 24 17 282.19
6 Northeast MetropolitanArea 14 12 444.44
7 Northeast MetropolitanArea 28 12 451.09
8 South MetropolitanArea 40 12 490.27
9 South MetropolitanArea 7 16 493.83
We shall fit regressions to this dataset using logarithm of weekly earnings as the response variable:
and years of experience as the covariate:
The following is the scatter plot between and .
import numpy as np
y = np.log(dt['WeeklyEarnings'])
x = dt['Exper']
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.figure(figsize = (10, 6))
plt.scatter(x, y, s = 1)
plt.xlabel('Years of Experience')
plt.ylabel('Log of Weekly Earnings')
plt.title('Scatter Plot of Years of Experience vs Log(Weekly Earnings)')
plt.show()
We want to use the following model. In this dataset, the variable takes the values . Considering all these possible knots (with the exception of the last value 63 because is always zero) leads us to the model equation: $$ y = \beta_0 + \beta_1 x + \beta_2 (x - 1)+ + \beta_3 (x - 2)+
\dots + \beta_{63}(x - 62)_+ \tag{1} $64$ coefficients.
#Here is how we can use OLS to fit the regression model with all possible knots 1, 2,.., 62.
X = sm.add_constant(x) #adding intercept
for knot in range(1, 63):
X[f'knot_{knot}'] = np.maximum(x - knot, 0)
model_all_knots = sm.OLS(y, X).fit()
print(model_all_knots.summary()) OLS Regression Results
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable: WeeklyEarnings R-squared: 0.139
Model: OLS Adj. R-squared: 0.137
Method: Least Squares F-statistic: 67.42
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 Prob (F-statistic): 0.00
Time: 13:41:40 Log-Likelihood: -22188.
No. Observations: 25437 AIC: 4.450e+04
Df Residuals: 25375 BIC: 4.501e+04
Df Model: 61
Covariance Type: nonrobust
==============================================================================
coef std err t P>|t| [0.025 0.975]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
const 5.4711 0.030 185.217 0.000 5.413 5.529
Exper 0.1347 0.040 3.390 0.001 0.057 0.213
knot_1 0.0323 0.066 0.491 0.623 -0.097 0.161
knot_2 -0.0847 0.061 -1.386 0.166 -0.205 0.035
knot_3 0.0185 0.056 0.331 0.741 -0.091 0.128
knot_4 -0.0753 0.053 -1.425 0.154 -0.179 0.028
knot_5 0.0762 0.052 1.465 0.143 -0.026 0.178
knot_6 -0.0510 0.051 -1.005 0.315 -0.151 0.049
knot_7 -0.0773 0.049 -1.565 0.118 -0.174 0.020
knot_8 0.1382 0.049 2.804 0.005 0.042 0.235
knot_9 -0.0891 0.049 -1.832 0.067 -0.184 0.006
knot_10 0.0031 0.048 0.064 0.949 -0.091 0.097
knot_11 -0.0265 0.048 -0.556 0.578 -0.120 0.067
knot_12 0.0711 0.048 1.490 0.136 -0.022 0.165
knot_13 -0.0524 0.048 -1.098 0.272 -0.146 0.041
knot_14 -0.0099 0.049 -0.201 0.841 -0.107 0.087
knot_15 0.0158 0.049 0.319 0.750 -0.081 0.113
knot_16 0.0372 0.050 0.739 0.460 -0.061 0.136
knot_17 -0.0554 0.050 -1.097 0.272 -0.154 0.044
knot_18 -0.0034 0.051 -0.066 0.947 -0.103 0.096
knot_19 -0.0130 0.054 -0.243 0.808 -0.118 0.092
knot_20 0.0394 0.056 0.698 0.485 -0.071 0.150
knot_21 -0.0460 0.059 -0.783 0.434 -0.161 0.069
knot_22 0.0370 0.059 0.623 0.533 -0.079 0.153
knot_23 -0.0154 0.061 -0.250 0.802 -0.136 0.105
knot_24 -0.0035 0.064 -0.055 0.956 -0.128 0.121
knot_25 0.0113 0.065 0.174 0.862 -0.116 0.139
knot_26 -0.0121 0.066 -0.182 0.856 -0.142 0.118
knot_27 -0.0291 0.068 -0.426 0.670 -0.163 0.105
knot_28 0.0647 0.069 0.933 0.351 -0.071 0.201
knot_29 -0.0132 0.070 -0.189 0.850 -0.150 0.124
knot_30 -0.0305 0.071 -0.429 0.668 -0.170 0.109
knot_31 -0.0261 0.073 -0.360 0.719 -0.168 0.116
knot_32 -0.0034 0.074 -0.045 0.964 -0.149 0.142
knot_33 0.0766 0.076 1.002 0.317 -0.073 0.226
knot_34 -0.0943 0.076 -1.235 0.217 -0.244 0.055
knot_35 0.1039 0.078 1.337 0.181 -0.048 0.256
knot_36 -0.1690 0.081 -2.079 0.038 -0.328 -0.010
knot_37 0.1986 0.084 2.362 0.018 0.034 0.363
knot_38 -0.0801 0.085 -0.938 0.348 -0.247 0.087
knot_39 -0.0127 0.087 -0.146 0.884 -0.183 0.158
knot_40 0.0045 0.083 0.054 0.957 -0.157 0.166
knot_41 -0.0718 0.087 -0.824 0.410 -0.243 0.099
knot_42 -0.0043 0.091 -0.047 0.962 -0.183 0.175
knot_43 0.1796 0.096 1.879 0.060 -0.008 0.367
knot_44 -0.1397 0.103 -1.350 0.177 -0.342 0.063
knot_45 -0.0091 0.111 -0.082 0.934 -0.226 0.208
knot_46 0.0326 0.120 0.271 0.786 -0.203 0.268
knot_47 -0.0828 0.131 -0.630 0.529 -0.340 0.175
knot_48 0.0582 0.146 0.399 0.690 -0.228 0.344
knot_49 -0.0267 0.162 -0.165 0.869 -0.344 0.290
knot_50 0.1124 0.194 0.581 0.562 -0.267 0.492
knot_51 -0.1186 0.235 -0.504 0.614 -0.580 0.342
knot_52 -0.0133 0.268 -0.050 0.960 -0.539 0.512
knot_53 0.1658 0.294 0.564 0.573 -0.410 0.742
knot_54 -0.2045 0.335 -0.611 0.541 -0.861 0.452
knot_55 0.1716 0.429 0.400 0.689 -0.669 1.012
knot_56 -0.4076 0.465 -0.877 0.380 -1.318 0.503
knot_57 0.5338 0.627 0.851 0.395 -0.696 1.763
knot_58 0.1181 0.700 0.169 0.866 -1.255 1.491
knot_59 -0.3092 0.314 -0.984 0.325 -0.925 0.306
knot_60 -0.7365 0.952 -0.774 0.439 -2.603 1.130
knot_61 0.9303 0.867 1.072 0.284 -0.770 2.631
knot_62 0.4651 0.434 1.072 0.284 -0.385 1.315
==============================================================================
Omnibus: 724.158 Durbin-Watson: 2.015
Prob(Omnibus): 0.000 Jarque-Bera (JB): 1054.343
Skew: -0.302 Prob(JB): 1.13e-229
Kurtosis: 3.794 Cond. No. 1.76e+16
==============================================================================
Notes:
[1] Standard Errors assume that the covariance matrix of the errors is correctly specified.
[2] The smallest eigenvalue is 4.47e-25. This might indicate that there are
strong multicollinearity problems or that the design matrix is singular.
#Plotting the fitted values of this model:
# Generate x_range for plotting
x_range = np.linspace(x.min(), x.max(), 100)
# Prepare a DataFrame for x_range
X_range = pd.DataFrame({'const': 1, 'x': x_range})
for knot in range(1, 63):
X_range[f'knot_{knot}'] = np.maximum(X_range['x'] - knot, 0)
fitted_model_all_knots = model_all_knots.predict(X_range)
plt.figure(figsize = (10, 6))
plt.scatter(x, y, s = 1)
plt.plot(x_range,fitted_model_all_knots, color = 'green', label = 'Fitted All Knots Regression')
plt.xlabel('Years of Experience')
plt.ylabel('Log of Weekly Earnings')
plt.title('All knots regression of y on x')
plt.legend()
plt.show()
The reason why this ‘all-knots’ regression model is giving us a poor fit is not because the model itself is inadequate but it is rather because of the use of OLS to estimate its coefficients. The sample size here is quite large (). The problem is much worse if the sample size were smaller. To illustrate this, consider fitting this model to a smaller dataset obtained by randomly sampling observations from the full dataset. This is demonstrated below.
#Repeating the analysis on a smaller dataset:
n = 500
random_seed = 42
dt_small = dt.sample(n = 500, random_state = random_seed)
print(dt_small.shape)
print(dt_small.head())
#dt_small = dt #this is to switch back to the full dataset(500, 5)
Region MetropolitanStatus Exper Educ WeeklyEarnings
8735 West MetropolitanArea 19 14 735.99
13369 Northeast NotMetropolitanArea 15 16 807.22
5512 Midwest NotMetropolitanArea 18 16 341.88
24277 South NotMetropolitanArea 32 12 240.38
24959 South MetropolitanArea 14 16 1210.83
#Let us now repeat the exercise fitting the quadratic model as well as the all-knots regression model on this smaller dataset:
y = np.log(dt_small['WeeklyEarnings'])
x = dt_small['Exper']
#Quadratic model:
X = sm.add_constant(x)
X['Exper_Square'] = np.square(x)
model_quad = sm.OLS(y, X).fit()
print(model_quad.summary())
#Plotting the fitted quadratic on the scatter plot
b0, b1, b2 = model_quad.params
x_range = np.linspace(x.min(), x.max(), 100)
fitted_model_quad = b0 + b1*x_range + b2*np.square(x_range)
X_all_knots = sm.add_constant(x) #adding intercept
for knot in range(1, 63):
X_all_knots[f'knot_{knot}'] = np.maximum(x - knot, 0)
model_all_knots = sm.OLS(y, X_all_knots).fit()
print(model_all_knots.summary())
# Prepare a DataFrame for x_range
X_range = pd.DataFrame({'const': 1, 'x': x_range})
for knot in range(1, 63):
X_range[f'knot_{knot}'] = np.maximum(X_range['x'] - knot, 0)
fitted_model_all_knots = model_all_knots.predict(X_range)
plt.figure(figsize = (10, 6))
plt.scatter(x, y, s = 5)
plt.plot(x_range,fitted_model_all_knots, color = 'green', label = 'Fitted All Knots Regression by OLS')
#plt.plot(x_range,fitted_model_quad, color = 'red', label = 'Fitted Quadratic')
plt.xlabel('Years of Experience')
plt.ylabel('Log of Weekly Earnings')
plt.title('All knots regression of y on x')
plt.legend()
plt.show() OLS Regression Results
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable: WeeklyEarnings R-squared: 0.183
Model: OLS Adj. R-squared: 0.180
Method: Least Squares F-statistic: 55.83
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 Prob (F-statistic): 1.34e-22
Time: 13:41:52 Log-Likelihood: -405.85
No. Observations: 500 AIC: 817.7
Df Residuals: 497 BIC: 830.3
Df Model: 2
Covariance Type: nonrobust
================================================================================
coef std err t P>|t| [0.025 0.975]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
const 5.6176 0.069 81.159 0.000 5.482 5.754
Exper 0.0666 0.007 9.404 0.000 0.053 0.080
Exper_Square -0.0011 0.000 -7.593 0.000 -0.001 -0.001
==============================================================================
Omnibus: 9.502 Durbin-Watson: 2.014
Prob(Omnibus): 0.009 Jarque-Bera (JB): 11.214
Skew: -0.226 Prob(JB): 0.00367
Kurtosis: 3.577 Cond. No. 2.09e+03
==============================================================================
Notes:
[1] Standard Errors assume that the covariance matrix of the errors is correctly specified.
[2] The condition number is large, 2.09e+03. This might indicate that there are
strong multicollinearity or other numerical problems.
OLS Regression Results
==============================================================================
Dep. Variable: WeeklyEarnings R-squared: 0.273
Model: OLS Adj. R-squared: 0.190
Method: Least Squares F-statistic: 3.298
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 Prob (F-statistic): 9.95e-12
Time: 13:41:52 Log-Likelihood: -376.83
No. Observations: 500 AIC: 857.7
Df Residuals: 448 BIC: 1077.
Df Model: 51
Covariance Type: nonrobust
==============================================================================
coef std err t P>|t| [0.025 0.975]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
const 5.1547 0.272 18.980 0.000 4.621 5.688
Exper 0.1953 0.351 0.557 0.578 -0.494 0.884
knot_1 0.1042 0.551 0.189 0.850 -0.978 1.186
knot_2 -0.0938 0.453 -0.207 0.836 -0.983 0.796
knot_3 -0.1610 0.384 -0.419 0.675 -0.916 0.594
knot_4 -0.2014 0.326 -0.617 0.538 -0.843 0.440
knot_5 0.6183 0.309 2.002 0.046 0.011 1.225
knot_6 -0.6134 0.296 -2.075 0.039 -1.194 -0.032
knot_7 0.3069 0.315 0.974 0.330 -0.312 0.926
knot_8 -0.1287 0.346 -0.372 0.710 -0.809 0.551
knot_9 0.0483 0.428 0.113 0.910 -0.794 0.890
knot_10 -0.0715 0.366 -0.195 0.845 -0.791 0.648
knot_11 -0.1556 0.334 -0.465 0.642 -0.813 0.502
knot_12 0.1899 0.331 0.574 0.566 -0.461 0.840
knot_13 0.2660 0.328 0.811 0.418 -0.378 0.910
knot_14 -0.5626 0.329 -1.709 0.088 -1.209 0.084
knot_15 0.3070 0.314 0.979 0.328 -0.309 0.923
knot_16 0.2728 0.389 0.701 0.484 -0.492 1.037
knot_17 -0.4239 0.364 -1.166 0.244 -1.139 0.291
knot_18 0.1405 0.329 0.427 0.669 -0.506 0.787
knot_19 -0.4726 0.305 -1.549 0.122 -1.072 0.127
knot_20 0.6368 0.350 1.821 0.069 -0.050 1.324
knot_21 -0.1141 0.373 -0.306 0.760 -0.847 0.619
knot_22 0.1367 0.361 0.379 0.705 -0.572 0.846
knot_23 -0.1656 0.387 -0.428 0.669 -0.926 0.595
knot_24 -0.1908 0.388 -0.492 0.623 -0.953 0.571
knot_25 0.1208 0.432 0.280 0.780 -0.728 0.970
knot_26 -0.2886 0.454 -0.636 0.525 -1.181 0.603
knot_27 0.6466 0.493 1.310 0.191 -0.323 1.616
knot_28 -0.1814 0.498 -0.365 0.716 -1.159 0.797
knot_29 -0.4298 0.476 -0.903 0.367 -1.365 0.506
knot_30 0.4724 0.462 1.021 0.308 -0.437 1.381
knot_31 -0.5066 0.438 -1.157 0.248 -1.367 0.354
knot_32 0.4254 0.462 0.920 0.358 -0.483 1.334
knot_33 -0.1973 0.476 -0.415 0.679 -1.133 0.738
knot_34 0.2300 0.505 0.456 0.649 -0.762 1.222
knot_35 -0.3746 0.530 -0.707 0.480 -1.416 0.667
knot_36 0.5390 0.562 0.959 0.338 -0.566 1.644
knot_37 -0.2597 0.703 -0.369 0.712 -1.642 1.122
knot_38 -0.5455 0.639 -0.854 0.394 -1.801 0.710
knot_39 0.7818 0.643 1.217 0.224 -0.481 2.045
knot_40 -0.0695 0.639 -0.109 0.913 -1.325 1.186
knot_41 -0.3461 0.725 -0.477 0.633 -1.772 1.079
knot_42 -0.4418 0.735 -0.601 0.548 -1.887 1.004
knot_43 0.1942 0.979 0.198 0.843 -1.730 2.119
knot_44 1.1360 1.194 0.951 0.342 -1.211 3.483
knot_45 -0.9202 0.914 -1.006 0.315 -2.717 0.877
knot_46 -0.5969 0.873 -0.684 0.494 -2.313 1.119
knot_47 0.4265 0.859 0.497 0.620 -1.261 2.114
knot_48 1.5575 1.152 1.352 0.177 -0.707 3.822
knot_49 -2.1921 0.941 -2.330 0.020 -4.041 -0.343
knot_50 0.6258 0.504 1.242 0.215 -0.365 1.616
knot_51 0.4172 0.336 1.242 0.215 -0.243 1.078
knot_52 0.2086 0.168 1.242 0.215 -0.122 0.539
knot_53 0 0 nan nan 0 0
knot_54 0 0 nan nan 0 0
knot_55 0 0 nan nan 0 0
knot_56 0 0 nan nan 0 0
knot_57 0 0 nan nan 0 0
knot_58 0 0 nan nan 0 0
knot_59 0 0 nan nan 0 0
knot_60 0 0 nan nan 0 0
knot_61 0 0 nan nan 0 0
knot_62 0 0 nan nan 0 0
==============================================================================
Omnibus: 12.537 Durbin-Watson: 2.023
Prob(Omnibus): 0.002 Jarque-Bera (JB): 15.793
Skew: -0.262 Prob(JB): 0.000372
Kurtosis: 3.696 Cond. No. 1.30e+18
==============================================================================
Notes:
[1] Standard Errors assume that the covariance matrix of the errors is correctly specified.
[2] The smallest eigenvalue is 1.49e-30. This might indicate that there are
strong multicollinearity problems or that the design matrix is singular.

Regularization via Bayesian Inference¶
We work with the following prior:
We treat and also as unknown parameters and assign the prior:
The posterior of can be described as follows.
The posterior of conditional on and is given by:
where is the diagonal matrix with diagonal entries . We use the approximation:
where is the diagonal matrix with diagonals .
The posterior mean of given is
This only depends on . The above can be viewed as ridge regularization with penalty .
The matrix in this high-dimensional linear regression is the following.
X = X_all_knots.to_numpy()
print(X.shape)
m = 63 #the parameters are b_0, \dots, b_m(500, 64)
Given a value of , the posterior mean estimate of is computed below. It is identical to ridge regression with .
#for a large gamma, the fit will coincide with least squares
#for a small gamma, the fit will coincide with linear regression.
#this can be used to get two values low and high for gamma
gamma_value = 0.0001
#gamma_value = 10
J_by_gammasq = np.diag(np.concatenate([[0, 0], np.repeat(gamma_value**(-2), m-1)]))
Mat = X.T @ X + J_by_gammasq
Matinv = np.linalg.inv(Mat)
betahat_gamma = Matinv @ X.T @ y.to_numpy().reshape(-1, 1)
#calculating the fitted values for a grid of x-values:
x_range = np.linspace(x.min(), x.max(), 100)
X_range = pd.DataFrame({'const': 1, 'x': x_range})
kmax = m-1
for knot in range(1, (1 + kmax)):
X_range[f'knot_{knot}'] = np.maximum(x_range - knot, 0)
fitted_model_postmean_gamma = X_range.values @ betahat_gamma
plt.figure(figsize = (10, 6))
plt.scatter(x, y, s = 5)
plt.plot(x_range,fitted_model_all_knots, color = 'green', label = 'Fitted All Knots Regression by OLS')
#plt.plot(x_range,fitted_model_quad, color = 'red', label = 'Fitted Quadratic')
plt.plot(x_range,fitted_model_postmean_gamma, color = 'black', label = 'Fitted Regularization')
plt.xlabel('Years of Experience')
plt.ylabel('Log of Weekly Earnings')
plt.title('All knots regression of y on x')
plt.legend()
plt.show()

We next describe the posterior of and . Unlike the case of the previous prior, the posterior of conditional on can be described in closed form as:
Finally the posterior of is given by:
We can compute this posterior on a grid of values. Now we only need a 1D grid for (unlike the previous model, where we needed two grids for and ). The extreme ends of this grid will be values for which the posterior mean (ridge regression) underfits the data (resulting in linear regression) and overfits the data (resulting in least squares) respectively.
gamma_low = 0.0001
gamma_high = 10
gamma_gr = np.logspace(np.log10(gamma_low), np.log10(gamma_high), 2000)
logpost_gamma = np.zeros(len(gamma_gr))
for i in range(len(gamma_gr)):
gamma = gamma_gr[i]
J_by_gammasq = np.diag(np.concatenate([[0, 0], np.repeat(gamma**(-2), m-1)]))
Mat = X.T @ X + J_by_gammasq
Matinv = np.linalg.inv(Mat)
sgn, logcovdet = np.linalg.slogdet(Matinv)
logpost_gamma[i] =(-m)*np.log(gamma) + 0.5 * logcovdet - (n/2 - 1)*np.log(y.T @ y - y.T @ X @ Matinv @ X.T @ y)
Below we compute the posterior of (correctly normalized) as well as the posterior mean.
post_gamma = np.exp(logpost_gamma - np.max(logpost_gamma))
post_gamma = post_gamma/np.sum(post_gamma)
postmean_gamma = np.sum(gamma_gr * post_gamma)
print(postmean_gamma)
print(1/(postmean_gamma ** 2)) #this is lambda = 1/gamma^20.02237594131493201
1997.2727251751714
Below we plot the posterior of as a function of . The x-axis is on the log-scale.
#Plotting post_gamma as a function of gamma:
plt.figure(figsize = (10, 6))
plt.plot(gamma_gr, post_gamma, color = 'blue')
plt.xscale('log')
plt.xlabel('Gamma (log scale)')
plt.ylabel('Posterior Probability')
plt.title('Posterior Distribution of Gamma')
plt.show()
Clearly, there is a single well-defined peak in this posterior distribution for . This means that the model is preferring a specific value of that is neither too big nor too small. We can create samples from this posterior of by simply sampling from the discretized distribution.
N = 2000
gamma_samples = np.random.choice(gamma_gr, size=N, p=post_gamma, replace=True)
plt.hist(gamma_samples, bins=30, color='lightgreen', edgecolor='black')
plt.title('Histogram of gamma samples')
plt.xlabel('gamma')
plt.ylabel('Frequency')
plt.show()
Using the samples of , samples from and can be constructed as follows.
sig_samples = np.zeros(N)
betahats = np.zeros((m+1, N))
for i in range(N):
gamma = gamma_samples[i]
J_by_gammasq = np.diag(np.concatenate([[0, 0], np.repeat(gamma**(-2), m-1)]))
Mat = X.T @ X + J_by_gammasq
Matinv = np.linalg.inv(Mat)
gamma_dist_lambda_parameter = (y.T @ y - y.T @ X @ Matinv @ X.T @ y)/2
gamma_dist_alpha_parameter = n/2 - 1
sig = np.sqrt(1/np.random.gamma(gamma_dist_alpha_parameter, 1/gamma_dist_lambda_parameter))
sig_samples[i] = sig
XTX = np.dot(X.T, X)
TempMat = np.linalg.inv((J_by_gammasq/(sig ** 2)) + (XTX/(sig ** 2)))
XTy = np.dot(X.T, y)
#generate betahat from the normal distribution with mean:
norm_mean = np.dot(TempMat, XTy/(sig ** 2))
#and covariance matrix:
norm_cov = TempMat
betahat = np.random.multivariate_normal(norm_mean, norm_cov)
betahats[:,i] = betahat
The overall estimate of can be obtained by taking the mean of the individual samples. This is the posterior mean estimate of in the full Bayesian model.
beta_est = np.mean(betahats, axis = 1)
Below we plot the fitted values corresponding to the posterior mean estimate of .
#calculating the fitted values for a grid of x-values:
x_range = np.linspace(x.min(), x.max(), 100)
X_range = pd.DataFrame({'const': 1, 'x': x_range})
for knot in range(1, (1 + kmax)):
X_range[f'knot_{knot}'] = np.maximum(x_range - knot, 0)
fitted_model_postmean_fullmodel = X_range.values @ beta_est
plt.figure(figsize = (10, 6))
plt.scatter(x, y, s = 5)
plt.plot(x_range,fitted_model_all_knots, color = 'green', label = 'Fitted All Knots Regression by OLS')
#plt.plot(x_range,fitted_model_quad, color = 'red', label = 'Fitted Quadratic')
plt.plot(x_range,fitted_model_postmean_fullmodel, color = 'black', label = 'Fitted Regularization')
plt.xlabel('Years of Experience')
plt.ylabel('Log of Weekly Earnings')
plt.title('All knots regression of y on x')
plt.legend()
plt.show()
It is interesting that the posterior mean estimate of corresponds to a smooth estimate of the underlying regression curve.
Below we plot the individual curves coming from posterior samples of . This gives an idea of the uncertainty associated with the fitted regression function.
#Plotting all the posterior fitted values:
plt.figure(figsize = (10, 6))
plt.scatter(x, y, s = 5)
for i in range(N):
fitted_model_postdraw = X_range.values @ betahats[:,i]
plt.plot(x_range, fitted_model_postdraw, color = 'lightsalmon', alpha = 0.25)
plt.plot(x_range, fitted_model_postmean_fullmodel, color = 'black', label = 'Posterior Mean')
plt.legend()
plt.show()

It is interesting that the uncertainty bands get wider near the end of the dataset where the data is sparse. Go back and repeat the analysis on the whole dataset (as opposed to the sample dataset of smaller size 500).